TB-500 — 10 things I got wrong before I got it right
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud.
The advice on secretagogue in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with the same confidence.
I have listed what I think the current consensus is below. Correct me — that is the point of posting it.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
Yeah, identity is the first question.
What was the batch number and which service?
regulatory status varies by country, check yours
regulatory status varies by country, check yours
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 35 weeks to accept.
focus on identity verification, handling, evidence state
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
Disagree on that part. 97.9% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
This is correct. Name it precisely.
everything else in the vial drawer, research peptides
name the compound precisely, TB-500 and Thymosin Beta-4 are not the same
thymosin fragments, GH secretagogues, handling, long tail
thymosin fragments, GH secretagogues, handling, long tail
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
not approved for human use, full stop
This is correct. Name it precisely.
focus on identity verification, handling, evidence state
The nausea was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
- 1Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.7 comments in this branch · started by u/rui_only_ro
- 2The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a…6 comments in this branch · started by u/iman_castellanos