u/laila_almeida

Confession thread, sort of. I went from 12.5mg to 5mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 10 weeks…

Speculation 27 comments91% upvoted312

comment on secretagogue: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/researchpeptides · 6 points · 1 year ago

regulatory status varies by country, check yours

permalink

comment on am I the only one who found goal weight harder than the injections in c/maintenancephase · 146 points · 1 year ago

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

permalink

comment on am I the only one who found goal weight harder than the injections in c/maintenancephase · 44 points · 1 year ago

food noise returns but not always immediately

permalink

622

c/researchpeptides·posted 1 year ago by u/laila_almeida

secretagogue: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1

Been lurking in c/cagrilintide for about 19 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 74, 5mg, and secretagogue is the bit I still cannot get…

Question 15 comments78% upvoted5

comment on 18 months in and hazard ratio is still the thing I get wrong in c/trialwatch · 85 points · 1 year ago

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

permalink

comment on vendor — my 9-week log, condensed into one table in c/vendorvetting · 14 points · 1 year ago

Homopeptide order #4, the Netherlands, no drama, receipts inside

permalink

comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about chargeback until somebody posts a number in c/cryptopay · 57 points · 1 year ago

Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.

permalink

comment on tried SURPASS for 11 weeks. here is what happened. in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 1 year ago

Phase 2 TRIUMPH looked amazing. Phase 3 trials are harder. Do not anchor on phase 2 readouts.

permalink

comment on tried SURPASS for 11 weeks. here is what happened. in c/trialwatch · 267 points · 1 year ago

STEP 1 readout: 98.9% mean weight loss, absolute numbers matter. Spread around that mean is enormous.

permalink

comment on tried SURPASS for 11 weeks. here is what happened. in c/trialwatch · 445 points · 1 year ago

STEP 1 readout: 96.2% mean weight loss, absolute numbers matter. Spread around that mean is enormous.

permalink

c/trialwatch·posted 1 year ago by u/laila_almeida

tried SURPASS for 11 weeks. here is what happened.

Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/compounding repeats that hazard ratio is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I…

Readout 30 comments85% upvoted13

comment on the confirmations question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/cryptopay · 51 points · 1 year ago

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

permalink

comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about regain until somebody posts a number in c/maintenancephase · 390 points · 1 year ago

This is correct. Weight variance is normal at maintenance.

permalink

comment on what would you tell week-1 you about hazard ratio in c/trialwatch · 121 points · 1 year ago

The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.

permalink

comment on what changed for me between week 35 and week 84 in c/glp1science · 164 points · 1 year ago

Which paper are you quoting?