u/joaquin_trevino
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Coimbra.
member · joined 16 Jul 2025
Comments — page 5 of 5
comment on test results: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/labresults · 24 points · 11 months ago
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
comment on reading STEP threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/trialwatch · -2 points · 11 months ago
give the trial name, phase, n, and primary endpoint in the body
comment on [Results] 61 weeks on 1.7mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/compounding · 102 points · 11 months ago
Strongly agree. API source transparency matters.
comment on tried PeptideMeter for 23 weeks. here is what happened. in c/labresults · 293 points · 1 year ago
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
comment on tried PeptideMeter for 23 weeks. here is what happened. in c/labresults · 48 points · 1 year ago
Is that 95.1% area or mass?
comment on tried PeptideMeter for 23 weeks. here is what happened. in c/labresults · 396 points · 1 year ago
the Medutest and PeptideMeter results differ by 4 points, both inside inter-lab variance
comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on insulin resistance in c/glp1women · 2 points · 1 year ago
hormonal contraception interactions are speculative
comment on small win: sarcopenia stopped being a problem at week 31 in c/glp1muscle · 7 points · 1 year ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on my ferritin moved and I cannot work out whether contraception is why in c/glp1women · 0 points · 1 year ago
hair-loss on contraception is real
comment on small win: sarcopenia stopped being a problem at week 31 in c/glp1muscle · -4 points · 1 year ago
protein sarcopenia, not "lots"
comment on 18 months in and hazard ratio is still the thing I get wrong in c/trialwatch · 102 points · 1 year ago
Phase 2 or phase 3?
comment on batch: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/labresults · 8 points · 1 year ago
Tested 17 batches from CPC over 90 weeks. Spread was 98.7% to 98.9, mostly 98.7. Consistent vendor.
comment on 7 months in and Apotheke is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1eu · -36 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Tag your country.
comment on help me understand waist, I have read the wiki twice in c/dosinglogs · 14 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, the consistency is the value.
comment on SELECT — 9 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/trialwatch · 2 points · 1 year ago
give the trial name, phase, n, and primary endpoint in the body
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 6 weeks to accept.
comment on SELECT — 9 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/trialwatch · 42 points · 1 year ago
the discontinuation arms are the interesting part, not the endpoint endpoints
comment on my hs-CRP moved and I cannot work out whether batch is why in c/labresults · 214 points · 1 year ago
the VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter results differ by 19 points, both inside inter-lab variance
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #24 — Germany, 35 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/orforglipron · 13 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. ATTAIN data is phase 22.
comment on DEXA: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/glp1muscle · 36 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Resistance training counts.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #14 — Germany, 29 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/dosinglogs · 6 points · 1 year ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.