u/ferran_mensah
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Odense.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Comments — page 4 of 4
comment on three years of 503A threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/compounding · 63 points · 1 year ago
What is the actual shortage list status right now?
comment on someone explain goal to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/progresspics · 5 points · 1 year ago
the milestone change matters as much as the scale
comment on nobody warned me about injection-site soreness and I would have liked the warning in c/tirzepatide · 40 points · 1 year ago
the 15mg is the top of the pen, not the required dose
comment on [Discussion] satiety is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/cagrilintide · 1 points · 1 year ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on dual agonist: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/tirzepatide · 3 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Tirz is better than sema is not a claim without a comparator dose.
comment on TGA — 21 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/glp1aus · 43 points · 1 year ago
Came off after 49 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.
comment on insulin resistance — 21 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/glp1women · 145 points · 1 year ago
pregnancy and trying-to-conceive get clinician pointer, not community advice
comment on small win: satiety stopped being a problem at week 25 in c/cagrilintide · 42 points · 1 year ago
The satiety on amylin analogs is described as physically different.
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on small win: satiety stopped being a problem at week 25 in c/cagrilintide · 59 points · 1 year ago
The satiety on amylin analogs is described as physically different. GLP-1 reduces appetite noise, amylin does co-agonism.
comment on small win: satiety stopped being a problem at week 25 in c/cagrilintide · 82 points · 1 year ago
CagriSema ratios in trials are fixed, do not extrapolate self-mixing
comment on [Question] GIP — what am I missing here in c/tirzepatide · 404 points · 1 year ago
SURMOUNT data is messier than STEP data but the weight loss is there
comment on Australia — my 7-week log, condensed into one table in c/glp1aus · 52 points · 2 years ago
Crossposting this to c/labresults because the people who need it are not reading this community.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for 503A posts in c/compounding · 30 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, 503A and 503B are different regulatory animals.
comment on [Question] Poland — has anyone got a straight answer on 503B in c/compounding · 55 points · 2 years ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on help me understand 503A, I have read the wiki twice in c/compounding · 14 points · 2 years ago
regulatory claims need a citation to the actual rule, not interpretation
Adding to this: API source is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on my ApoB moved and I cannot work out whether 503A is why in c/compounding · 0 points · 2 years ago
API transparency is the question that separates good compounders from sketchy ones
comment on [Discussion] the co-agonism advice in here is 19 years out of date in c/cagrilintide · 1 points · 2 years ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on [Discussion] the tirzepatide advice in here is 22 years out of date in c/tirzepatide · 107 points · 2 years ago
SURMOUNT data is messier than STEP data but the weight loss is there
comment on [Lab] SSA survo — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 96.2% in c/compounding · 20 points · 2 years ago
no pharmacy referral codes, naming is fine, recruiting is not
comment on [Vendor] QST order #6 — Denmark, 3 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/tirzepatide · 1.7k points · 2 years ago
Slight fix: the number was 97.2, not 97.4. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.