u/alcohol_aversion

phase 2 is not phase 3, smaller n and shorter trial

[removed by moderator]

Disagree on that part. 99.2% and 98.1% on the same vial is normal.

state the method: column, gradient, detection wavelength, injection volume

Went through three vendors to find one that actually ships on-time and tests clean. The answer was WWB.

Spent 12 weeks confused about concentration math until someone showed me the table. 5mg, 3mL, concentration is 5/3.

Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

dosing errors come from people reconstituting two vials differently and forgetting which is which

the method line is doing real work, not just window dressing

do not crack the pen, we have been over this

u-100 syringe, not u-40, or your math is off by factor of 23

Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.

Strongly agree. If it is not working at 5mg after 33 weeks, going up is not automatically the answer.

stalled at 1.0mg, went up, and regretted it, the stall would have broken anyway

titration speed is titration plus side effects, period

state the method: column, gradient, detection wavelength, injection volume

Genuine question — what concentration were you at?

nope, 0.25 counts, it is just not the dose most people stay on