u/alcohol_aversion

the appetite change on tirz is more than just reduced hunger, it is different machinery

absolute risk reduction, not relative risk reduction, that is how you decide

PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds

the Medutest number or it did not happen

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 99.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

First order from CPC was great, second one had a different batch and tested lower. The vendor retested and credited me. Logged it here.

The VendorInvestigate and Janoshik numbers on the same vial from TFC came back 97.4% and 96.2%. Both are right, inter-lab variance is real.

Sceptical.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

Mechanistically the bit that matters is reconstitution. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.

the constipation passes. i promise. not medical advice.

Strongly agree. Phase 2 is investigational, not conclusive.

What were the related substances listed individually?

the reship rate on TFC is actually pretty consistent

The related substances profile is way more interesting than the main peak %. A 98% with 16 peaks is different from a 98% that is one 27% impurity.

Detection wavelength? chromatogram and that changes at different wavelengths.

Yeah, protein matters on rapid loss.

Detection wavelength? integration and that changes at different wavelengths.

Yeah, 47 weeks on 0.5mg, same pattern, same timing.

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

i am begging people to write down the concentration