[Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on VendorInvestigate
PeptideMeter. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/retatrutide is downstream of it. Titration speed, early fullness, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort PeptideMeter out first, and almost nobody does. I say this having got it wrong for 4…
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard
SWB order #7, New Zealand, no drama, receipts inside
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
I am going to push back on this slightly.
CPC took 10 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
[removed by moderator]
the reship rate on HJ is actually pretty consistent
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
First order from TFC was great, second one had a different batch and tested lower. The vendor retested and credited me. Logged it here.
Removed a chain here.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
the batch number or it did not happen
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop