GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Question] how do you actually verify Medutest — 62 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.9k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 1 year ago by u/dagny_ogunleye

[Question] how do you actually verify Medutest

Questionbranch of 9 comments

Quick one. Canada here. reship works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US. Specifics: the route I used took 10 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the…

Read the full submission and all 62 comments →

This branch

9 comments, started 1 year ago
u/batch_number_bertieMOD292 points·1 year ago

Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_almeida83 points·1 year ago

order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kaia_cabrera363 points·1 year ago·edited

independent test or vendor COA, which is it

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_duarte-33 points·1 year ago

SSA order #18, Poland, no drama, receipts inside

replysharereportpermalink
u/tl_dr_tina234 points·1 year ago

receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule

replysharereportpermalink
u/sig_figs_sammod · analytical83 points·1 year ago

Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tl_dr_tina63 points·1 year ago

referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions

replysharereportpermalink
u/amara_haddad18 points·1 year ago

the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number

replysharereportpermalink
u/amara_haddad7 points·1 year ago

the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number

Adding to this: Medutest is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.