GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of is it normal to get injection-site soreness at week 29 — 60 comments in the full submission. View in context.
779
c/vendorvetting·submitted 2 years ago by u/honest_syringe19

is it normal to get injection-site soreness at week 29

Vendorbranch of 8 comments

Right, the VendorInvestigate question again, but with numbers this time. I have 7 data points over 6 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am…

Read the full submission and all 60 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 2 years ago
u/lina_falk0 points·2 years ago
reading this at 2am on my 6th week. thank you.
replysharereportpermalink
u/laila_almeida1 point·2 years ago

did they reship, credit, or ghost you?

replysharereportpermalink
u/step_count_stan1 point·2 years ago

This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_dziedzic1 point·2 years ago

Did you test the vial you received or are we going off the vendor COA?

replysharereportpermalink
u/coa_janitormod · c/coa1 point·2 years ago·edited

vendor staff must self-identify, full stop

replysharereportpermalink
u/pavel_kravchenko1 point·2 years ago

Is that a VendorInvestigate result or are you quoting the vendor COA?

replysharereportpermalink
u/kaia_cabrera1 point·2 years ago

one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread

replysharereportpermalink
u/fibre_forward1 point·2 years ago

did they reship, credit, or ghost you?

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.