GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
3.6k
c/vendorvetting·posted 2 years ago by u/kofi_ferreira

my ApoB moved and I cannot work out whether reship is why

Resolved Sourced ×1 The Quiet One ×3 Clean Column ×3

Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.

The claim: vendor matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 10 months without either producing anything.

What would actually settle it is 13 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.

If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.

4,257 up / 690 down86% upvoted12 commentsid 1gz23s14 Nov 2023

12 comments

7 in this archive, depth 3

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/kaia_cabrera729 points·2 years ago

How many orders from QYB is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]515 points·2 years ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/laila_almeida159 points·2 years ago

the reship rate on KP is actually pretty consistent

replysharereportpermalink
u/dilara_weiss0 points·2 years ago

Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.

replysharereportpermalink
u/milos_vestergaard-13 points·2 years ago

Which service tested it and what did they come back with?

replysharereportpermalink
u/kaia_cabrera1 point·2 years ago

did they reship, credit, or ghost you?

replysharereportpermalink
u/receipts_or_nothingMOD388 points·2 years ago

Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.

replysharereportpermalink
About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.