[Meta] the Janoshik rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 5mg, week 8, sulphur burps present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — testing — and tracked it for 16 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
[removed by moderator]
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
Slight fix: the number was 99.1, not 93.7. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
Homopeptide took 9 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
SSA order #14, Sweden, no drama, receipts inside
How many orders from BCH is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.
Ordered from KP, got the vial, tested it myself via VendorInvestigate, and it held the claim. Order fulfilled.
Went through three vendors to find one that actually ships on-time and tests clean. The answer was SWB.
Ordered from KP, got the vial, tested it myself via VendorInvestigate, and it held the claim.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 50 weeks to accept.
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
How many orders from QSC is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.
QSC took 2 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
the reship rate on FGP is actually pretty consistent
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
Tested 13 batches from WWB over 21 weeks. The consistency is the signal. They claim 98, they deliver 98.
MKM order #14, Canada, no drama, receipts inside
Tested 13 batches from WWB over 21 weeks.
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
Reship, credit, or they ghosted you? That matters.
the PeptideMeter result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
- 1Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.9 comments in this branch · started by u/nordic_pricing
- 2Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is…6 comments in this branch · started by u/joaquin_petrov