vendor vs testing — genuinely asking which matters more
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: vendor matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 19 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 19 people measuring the same…
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
The PeptideMeter and Medutest numbers on the same vial from MKM came back 98.3% and 97.4%. Both are right, inter-lab variance is real.
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
JEEP order #18, Ireland, no drama, receipts inside
Not to be pedantic but vendor and Medutest are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
HJ took 8 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard
Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
Not to be pedantic but Janoshik and Medutest are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
the reship rate on HJ is actually pretty consistent
Small correction: the trial was 17 weeks, not 12. Does not change your point but people will quote it.