GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Vendor] HJ — small operation, honest about lead times, that is worth something — 68 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2.4k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 1 months ago by u/bpc_sceptic

[Vendor] HJ — small operation, honest about lead times, that is worth something

Vendorbranch of 8 comments

Right, the VendorInvestigate question again, but with numbers this time. I have 13 data points over 30 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am…

Read the full submission and all 68 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 1 months ago
u/alcohol_aversion292 points·1 months ago

Did you test the vial you received or are we going off the vendor COA?

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_osei89 points·1 months ago

independent test or vendor COA, which is it

replysharereportpermalink
u/bpc_scepticOPresearch peptides47 points·1 months ago

CPC three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure. Powder tested 98.1% anyway, so no harm done.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bpc_scepticOPresearch peptides28 points·1 months ago

one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]62 points·1 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/bpc_scepticOPresearch peptides34 points·1 months ago

SSA three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure. Powder tested 97.6% anyway, so no harm done.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hamza_serrano240 points·1 months ago

Order date, product, and result, in that order please?

replysharereportpermalink
u/alcohol_aversion148 points·1 months ago

positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.