[PSA] a vendor-supplied COA is a marketing document until someone else agrees with it
Right, the VendorInvestigate question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 17 data points over 8 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 88, not week 42. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
[removed by moderator]
Reship, credit, or they ghosted you? That matters.
[removed by moderator]
Adding to this: reship is doing more work than the comment implies.
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
Slight fix: the number was 99.2, not 99.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Slight fix: the number was 99.2, not 99.1.
Adding to this: order records is doing more work than the comment implies.
SGN order #15, Ireland, no drama, receipts inside
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
- 1Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.11 comments in this branch · started by u/batch_number_bertie