GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of does SURPASS actually matter or is it forum lore at this point — 49 comments in the full submission. View in context.
5k
c/trialwatch·submitted 2 years ago by u/formulary_fighter

does SURPASS actually matter or is it forum lore at this point

Press Releasebranch of 7 comments

Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 2.5mg, week 5, constipation present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — TRIUMPH — and tracked it for 9 weeks. Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am…

Read the full submission and all 49 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 2 years ago
u/sten_palacios476 points·2 years ago

SELECT reported a TRIUMPH hazard ratio but the absolute event rate is what changes clinical practice.

replysharereportpermalink
u/alcohol_aversion130 points·2 years ago

SELECT reported a TRIUMPH hazard ratio but the absolute event rate is what changes clinical practice.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

replysharereportpermalink
u/annika_fonseca63 points·2 years ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nayeli_fonseca50 points·2 years ago·edited

the relative risk reduction in headlines is not the whole story

replysharereportpermalink
u/rohan_cardoso16 points·2 years ago

I am going to push back on this slightly.

replysharereportpermalink
u/naomi_ekstrom63 points·2 years ago

STEP, SURMOUNT, SURPASS, SELECT, FLOW, TRIUMPH — read the appendix

replysharereportpermalink
u/curious_panel_only153 points·2 years ago

Strongly agree. Phase 2 is investigational, not conclusive.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/trialwatch

Clinical trial reading group. New readouts, protocol amendments, endpoint definitions, dropout handling, and the difference between a press release and a publication. Absolute risk reduction and number-needed-to-treat are house dialect here.

34kmembers
95submissions
Nov 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.comSponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
More in c/trialwatch
c/trialwatch rules
  1. Press-release-only posts must be flaired Press Release until a publication exists.
  2. Give the trial name, phase, n, and primary endpoint in the body.
  3. Relative risk reduction alone is not a result. Show the absolute numbers.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/trialwatch_theou/forest_plot_fionau/hazard_ratio_halu/renal_outcomes_r
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →