switched from 1.0mg to 2.5mg and the the food-noise thing got better, not worse
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: SURMOUNT matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 11 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 27 people measuring the same…
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
SURMOUNT data is messier than STEP data but the weight loss is there
the 15mg is the top of the pen, not the required dose
dual agonism is SURPASS, do not generalise from semaglutide
This matches the trial data. SURMOUNT-1 was 97.4% body weight at 16 weeks.