[Results] 41 weeks on 7.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud.
The advice on Mounjaro in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with the same confidence.
I have listed what I think the current consensus is below. Correct me — that is the point of posting it.
best — the order this archive was captured in
the 15mg is the top of the pen, not the required dose
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
Week 26 on Mounjaro and 34kg down. The appetite reduction feels different from sema in ways I do not have words for yet.
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
dual agonism is GIP, do not generalise from semaglutide
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
Hard agree. The food noise disappears differently on the two compounds.
Cosigning. The GIP contribution is real and the side effects are not simply scaled versions.
Cosigning.
Adding to this: GIP is doing more work than the comment implies.
the nausea from tirz is different, not necessarily worse
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
Zepbound and Mounjaro are literally the same drug, the name is the only difference
Sceptical.
Disagree on that part. 97.9% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
the dual agonism hits different and that is why people describe it differently
Sceptical.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 14 weeks to accept.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
stalled on sema, tried tirz, and the curves were actually different shapes
Cosigning. The GIP contribution is real and the side effects are not simply scaled versions.
- 1Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do…5 comments in this branch · started by u/teodor_szabo
- 2Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is…4 comments in this branch · started by u/elin_varga