[Lab] 12th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.
I have been tracking 2.4mg against triglycerides for 31 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.
Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.
tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.
best — the order this archive was captured in
the sulphur burps passes. i promise. not medical advice.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
titration speed is titration plus side effects, period
titration speed is titration plus side effects, period
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
Did you test the vial you received or are we going off the vendor COA?
stalled at 0.5mg, went up, and regretted it, the stall would have broken anyway
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
Not to be pedantic but titration and Wegovy are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
- 1the sulphur burps passes. i promise. not medical advice.6 comments in this branch · started by u/meta_analysis_mo