food noise: what the trials say vs what this community says
Been lurking in c/dosinglogs for about 15 months and finally have something worth posting.
Short version: week 11, 0.5mg, and titration is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 33 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle.
What I actually want to know is whether the people saying it does not matter have measured it, or whether it is just repeated confidently. Happy to be told I am overthinking this — I probably am — but I would rather overthink it now than at week 5.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
okay but what dose of sema are you on
This matches my experience almost exactly on the Ozempic pens. The titration is the whole point.
week 67 and i am still not at maintenance, do not rush the ladder
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
week 86 and i am still not at maintenance, do not rush the ladder
okay but what dose of sema are you on
Tried the split-dose thing for 20 weeks. Felt slightly smoother, lost at exactly the same rate. Went back to weekly.
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
week 93 and i am still not at maintenance, do not rush the ladder
- 1week 67 and i am still not at maintenance, do not rush the ladder5 comments in this branch · started by u/marit_coelho