titration: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.
I have been tracking 2.4mg against ApoB for 33 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.
Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.
tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Cosigning. The slow route gets the outcome, the fast route gets you the side effects.
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
stalled at 1.7mg, went up, and regretted it, the stall would have broken anyway
Did you test the vial you received or are we going off the vendor COA?
the 2.4mg dose is not the target, it is just what the pen goes up to
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
The thing nobody prepared me for was that the appetite does not come back for a long time after you stop.
nope, 0.25 counts, it is just not the dose most people stay on
titration speed is food noise plus side effects, period
- 1Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next…4 comments in this branch · started by u/titration_marshal