[Discussion] can we stop arguing about retatrutide until somebody posts a number
I have had 5 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.
Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 30 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.
The independent number came back 97.9% against a claimed 98.0%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.
Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.
best — the order this archive was captured in
I am going to push back on this slightly.
The heart rate signal in TRIUMPH is real and concerning. Higher doses had higher mean HR changes.
I am going to push back on this slightly.
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3 compounds.
Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3 compounds.
[removed by moderator]
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.
The glucagon component does different things than dual agonism. The muscle cramps are not just amplified versions.
- 1Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3…4 comments in this branch · started by u/andres_sorensen