TRIUMPH: what the trials say vs what this community says
Right, the triple agonist question again, but with numbers this time. I have 10 data points over 30 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am…
Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.
Strongly agree.
Adding to this: dose escalation is doing more work than the comment implies.
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 97.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 97.2.
Adding to this: TRIUMPH is doing more work than the comment implies.
nobody should be giving this to anyone without extensive monitoring
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
Did you actually measure heart rate or is that a feeling?