GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of 12 months in and triple agonist is still the thing I get wrong — 41 comments in the full submission. View in context.
8.3k
c/retatrutide·submitted 2 years ago by u/incretin_ivy

12 months in and triple agonist is still the thing I get wrong

Trial Databranch of 12 comments

Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking retatrutide against triglycerides for 9 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here. Caveats up front: one person, one lab,…

Read the full submission and all 41 comments →

This branch

12 comments, started 2 years ago
u/ewan_zielinski563 points·2 years ago
this deserves more than 19 upvotes
replysharereportpermalink
u/lurker_for_years341 points·2 years ago

triple agonism is phase 2, do not generalise

replysharereportpermalink
u/sena_teixeira286 points·2 years ago

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

replysharereportpermalink
u/elodie_grimaldi89 points·2 years ago

the glucagon component changes the side effect profile, not just the efficacy

replysharereportpermalink
u/incretin_ivyOPpharmacology36 points·2 years ago

What was the dosing schedule in that arm?

replysharereportpermalink
u/lurker_for_years218 points·2 years ago

Which trial arm and what was the n?

replysharereportpermalink
u/bastian_ekstrom69 points·2 years ago·edited

heart rate and dose escalation need actual measurements, not impressions

replysharereportpermalink
u/incretin_ivyOPpharmacology94 points·2 years ago

Dose escalation on retatrutide is steeper and faster than on semaglutide. Do not assume the titration patterns transfer.

replysharereportpermalink
u/two_mil_or_one131 points·2 years ago

The heart rate signal in TRIUMPH is real and concerning. Higher doses had higher mean HR changes.

replysharereportpermalink
u/liver_enzyme_liz155 points·2 years ago

triple agonism plus glucagon is a different physiological state than GIP/GLP-1 dual

replysharereportpermalink
u/rui_only_ro109 points·2 years ago

Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.

replysharereportpermalink
u/source_or_silence55 points·2 years ago

the glucagon component changes the side effect profile, not just the efficacy

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/retatrutide

Retatrutide: GIP/GLP-1/glucagon triple agonism, the TRIUMPH programme, and the fact that most people discussing it are handling research-grade material with no human-use approval anywhere. Dose-response, heart-rate signal, and the unusually steep phase-2 weight curves get argued about here weekly.

65kmembers
130submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/retatrutide rules
  1. Retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use. Posts must not read as usage instructions.
  2. Phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers. Cite the trial and the dose arm.
  3. Heart-rate and dose-escalation reports need actual measurements, not impressions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.