Spain: concentration, and what it actually costs here
Quick one. Canada here.
reconstitution works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US.
Specifics: the route I used took 10 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the cost. The thing that would have saved me the most time was knowing which document to ask for at the start.
Happy to answer questions from anyone in the same jurisdiction.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
The single most useful thing I did was write the concentration on the vial. Stopped all the confusion after that.
never post a calculation as advice without stating the concentration
Not to be pedantic but reconstitution and dead space are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Not to be pedantic but reconstitution and dead space are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 66 weeks to accept.
i am begging people to write down the concentration
Are you using a u-100 or u-40 syringe? That changes everything.
show your working or it is unhelpful
What was the vial size and how much bac water?
swirl, do not shake, or you are courting oxidation
Small correction: the trial was 11 weeks, not 7. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
Small correction: the trial was 19 weeks, not 29. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with mg/mL, not with what you concluded.
Yeah, showing the arithmetic is the fastest way for someone to spot the error.
The single most useful thing I did was write the concentration on the vial. Stopped all the confusion after that.
This is correct. 3mL versus 9mL is the common mistake.
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
Yeah, showing the arithmetic is the fastest way for someone to spot the error.
the concentration on the vial in marker is the most important step
the concentration on the vial in marker is the most important step
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
Crossposting this to c/survodutide because the people who need it are not reading this community.
swirl, do not shake, or you are courting oxidation
The single most useful thing I did was write the concentration on the vial. Stopped all the confusion after that.
dead space is real and the syringe matters
- 1Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is…15 comments in this branch · started by u/india_generic_g
- 2Yeah, showing the arithmetic is the fastest way for someone to spot the error.4 comments in this branch · started by u/kavya_radich