[Meta] proposal — a flair for bacteriostatic water posts
mg/mL. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/intlshipping is downstream of it. Titration speed, early fullness, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort mg/mL out first, and almost nobody does. I say this having got it wrong for 17 months. My eGFR…
dosing errors come from people reconstituting two vials differently and forgetting which is which
dosing errors come from people reconstituting two vials differently and forgetting which is which
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
Cored the stopper on my 5th draw because I kept using the same entry point. Rotate the puncture site.
Cosigning. The concentration on the vial in marker is load-bearing.
i am begging people to write down the concentration
the concentration on the vial in marker is the most important step
Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
dosing errors come from people reconstituting two vials differently and forgetting which is which
Are you using a u-100 or u-40 syringe? That changes everything.
never post a calculation as advice without stating the concentration
Are you using a u-100 or u-40 syringe?
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 95 weeks to accept.
Small correction: the trial was 11 weeks, not 14. Does not change your point but people will quote it.