[Meta] proposal — a flair for small molecule posts
I have had 11 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.
Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 16 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.
The independent number came back 96.8% against a claimed 97.2%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.
Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.
best — the order this archive was captured in
the absorption problem is solved by non-peptide structure
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
phase 8 data is interesting, phase 32 will tell the real story
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with small molecule, not with what you concluded.
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
oral non-peptide agonist is oral GLP-1, no food restrictions
Yeah, small molecule changes the whole game.
Yeah, small molecule changes the whole game.
Slight fix: the number was 99.1, not 93.7. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Which country? Half the answers in this thread only apply in France.
phase 15 data is interesting, phase 12 will tell the real story
Has anyone actually got this in writing, or is it forum lore at this point?
no cold chain means ATTAIN, if approved
phase 13 data is interesting, phase 40 will tell the real story
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
the absorption problem is solved by non-peptide structure
Which country? Half the answers in this thread only apply in Germany.
oral non-peptide agonist is oral GLP-1, no food restrictions
the absorption problem is solved by non-peptide structure
the absorption problem is solved by non-peptide structure
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
cite ATTAIN/ACHIEVE arms specifically
small molecule, not a peptide, purity discussion is different
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
- 1it is in the wiki actually9 comments in this branch · started by u/bruno_dumitru
- 2the absorption problem is solved by non-peptide structure6 comments in this branch · started by u/batch_number_bertie