u/emeka_delgado

formulary exclusions are negotiable sometimes

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

Disagree on that part. 99.2% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.

This is correct. Dry powder is way more robust than liquid.

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.

Yeah, data logger is the only acceptable proof.

redact member ids and group numbers from every screenshot

customs clearance often breaks the cold chain, factor that in

Yeah, data logger is the only acceptable proof.

Disagree on that part. 96.8% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.

Peak temperature and how long at that temperature?

Logger trace from my shipment: 20 hours at 17°C. Powder tested 94.2% against 98.4% claim. Tolerates more than the box implies.

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

PBS/TGA claims need the notice or schedule entry

dosing errors come from people reconstituting two vials differently and forgetting which is which Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 11

Disagree on that part. 96.8% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.

no tracking numbers, no full addresses, no label photos — instant removal

Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.

Has anyone actually got this in writing, or is it forum lore at this point?

Yeah, the 2024 rule change was sudden.