switched from 2.4mg to 1.7mg and the fatigue got better, not worse
I have had 19 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.
Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 38 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.
The independent number came back 96.8% against a claimed 97.2%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.
Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
Mechanistically the bit that matters is week one. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
be kind, condescending answers are removed
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
This is a good question, genuinely.
the beginner question is not dumb
This is a good question, genuinely.
Adding to this: week one is doing more work than the comment implies.
- 1This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three…7 comments in this branch · started by u/tidy_vialdrawer_pls