GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
163
c/meta·posted 1 year ago by u/hamza_weiss

someone explain wiki to me like I have not read a paper in years

Discussion

Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.

I have been tracking meta against eGFR for 17 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.

Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.

tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.

168 up / 5 down97% upvoted10 commentsid 8apss05 Feb 2025

10 comments

9 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/placebo_arm_pam31 points·1 year ago

What was the batch number and which service?

replysharereportpermalink
u/farid_jansen10 points·1 year ago

the moderation decision is logged

replysharereportpermalink
u/kenji_vasquez6 points·1 year ago

the wiki is the source

replysharereportpermalink
u/chain_confirm_cpayments3 points·1 year ago

Yeah, the evidence standard works.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dizzy_on_standing23 points·1 year ago

the site talking about itself

replysharereportpermalink
u/hamza_weissOP13 points·1 year ago

sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly

replysharereportpermalink
u/draw_up_dizzy15 points·1 year ago

How many weeks between the two measurements?

replysharereportpermalink
u/katrin_diallo13 points·1 year ago

the ranking formula is meta

replysharereportpermalink
u/enzo_fonseca8 points·1 year ago

Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →