maintenance vs dose stretching — genuinely asking which matters more
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.
I have been tracking maintenance against triglycerides for 37 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.
Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.
tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Regain on a taper is expected. 10% back over 24 weeks, which matches the discontinuation data. Planned for it.
Tried the lowest-effective approach. 1.7mg worked for 13 weeks, then cravings returned. 0.5mg was the actual floor.
Tried the lowest-effective approach.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 34 weeks to accept.
regain is not a moral failing
the 2.4mg dose works fine for 95 weeks of the month
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.