[Meta] the maintenance rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining
I have had 18 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.
Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 16 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.
The independent number came back 99.0% against a claimed 98.0%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.
Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.
best — the order this archive was captured in
This is correct. Weight variance is normal at maintenance.
Strongly agree. Lowest effective dose is a real discovery process.
the 1.0mg dose works fine for 47 weeks of the month
weight moves within 16kg and that is normal
Tried the lowest-effective approach. 2.4mg worked for 4 weeks, then cravings returned. 1.0mg was the actual floor.
[removed by moderator]
nobody posts about this part and it is the longest part
[removed by moderator]
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 99.0% on the same vial is normal.
Tried the lowest-effective approach. 2.4mg worked for 9 weeks, then cravings returned. 5mg was the actual floor.
the 12.5mg dose works fine for 31 weeks of the month
- 1the 1.0mg dose works fine for 47 weeks of the month8 comments in this branch · started by u/mass_spec_maggie