goal weight is the most under-discussed thing in c/trialwatch
Been lurking in c/retatrutide for about 23 months and finally have something worth posting.
Short version: week 93, 1.0mg, and lowest effective dose is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 13 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle.
What I actually want to know is whether the people saying it does not matter have measured it, or whether it is just repeated confidently. Happy to be told I am overthinking this — I probably am — but I would rather overthink it now than at week 4.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Regain on a taper is expected. 14% back over 28 weeks, which matches the discontinuation data. Planned for it.
Weight variance within what range?
Did you stretch the dose interval?
the plateau is where the learning happens
Did you stretch the dose interval?
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Strongly agree. Lowest effective dose is a real discovery process.
regain after taper is expected, plan for it
Yeah, maintenance is the boring part and the important part.
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
Rodent data is rodent data.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 18 weeks to accept.
- 1Did you stretch the dose interval?7 comments in this branch · started by u/priya_weiss