[Meta] the below spec rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud. The advice on Medutest in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with…
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
the 99.2% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
inter-lab variance is real, 21 points is inside normal
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.