GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
829
c/labresults·posted 2 years ago by u/greta_nilsen

[PSA] Janoshik is not what most of this community thinks it is

Discussion Cold Box ×2

Been lurking in c/bloodwork for about 16 months and finally have something worth posting.

Short version: week 25, 5mg, and PeptideMeter is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 9 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle.

What I actually want to know is whether the people saying it does not matter have measured it, or whether it is just repeated confidently. Happy to be told I am overthinking this — I probably am — but I would rather overthink it now than at week 19.

1,263 up / 434 down74% upvoted27 commentsid 1p2jh128 Mar 2024

27 comments

13 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/marisol_moreau-6 points·2 years ago
oh thank god it is not just me
replysharereportpermalink
u/kenji_kimani121 points·2 years ago

Tested 16 batches from CPC over 24 weeks. Spread was 98.3% to 98.7, mostly 98.3. Consistent vendor.

replysharereportpermalink
u/reship_roulette68 points·2 years ago

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/noor_cardoso84 points·2 years ago

the 94.2% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal

replysharereportpermalink
u/usp_appendixcompendial19 points·2 years ago

Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 99.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/meera_oyelaran9 points·2 years ago

multiple batches from WWB show a spread, that is the data

replysharereportpermalink
u/plateau_patrol4 points·2 years ago

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
u/medutest_melMOD46 points·2 years ago

Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.

replysharereportpermalink
u/neha_rahimi37 points·2 years ago·edited

the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches

replysharereportpermalink
u/greta_nilsenOP0 points·2 years ago

Is that 97.4% area or mass?

replysharereportpermalink
u/usp_appendixcompendial30 points·2 years ago

template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result

replysharereportpermalink
u/meera_oyelaran13 points·2 years ago

This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.

replysharereportpermalink
u/edit_for_clarity20 points·2 years ago

Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 99.3. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.