GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] the Medutest advice in here is 8 years out of date — 34 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.2k
c/labresults·submitted 1 year ago by u/kenji_kimani

[Discussion] the Medutest advice in here is 8 years out of date

Discussionbranch of 7 comments

I have had 12 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe. Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 34 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February. The independent number came back 93.7% against a claimed…

Read the full submission and all 34 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 1 year ago
u/diego_szabo-6 points·1 year ago

QYB claimed 97.2%, PeptideMeter came back 98.7%. 24 points is inter-lab variance, no drama.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tuva_kirchner1 point·1 year ago

SGN / BPC / batch 6 / Janoshik / 99.3% — that is the shape

replysharereportpermalink
u/boots_or_bust1 point·1 year ago

QYB claimed 97.2%, PeptideMeter came back 98.7%.

Disagree on that part. 97.2% and 97.4% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lift_heavy_thingsresistance training1 point·1 year ago

template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result

replysharereportpermalink
u/arne_restrepo1 point·1 year ago

Batch number? Date of test?

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_nwosu1 point·1 year ago

inter-lab variance is real, 4 points is inside normal

replysharereportpermalink
u/meera_oyelaran1 point·1 year ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.comSponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
More in c/labresults
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/janoshik_junkieu/medutest_melu/peptidemeter_patu/coa_janitor
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →