8 months in and transit time is still the thing I get wrong
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 5mg, week 10, sulphur burps present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — lane — and tracked it for 5 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
transit time variance is the story, not the average
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
the community lane table lives here
This is correct. Variance is the story.
DHL was 18 days door-to-door but shipping. EMS took 22 days but cheaper and fine.
[removed by moderator]
WWB ships from Denmark, arrival is 12 to 32 days on average
customs clearance often adds 9 days, factor that in
Yeah, the lane data is more useful than single reports.
Ireland to Ireland: SSA with 19 days is the average, variance is 31
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
lane reports need origin, destination, carrier, actual transit days
Germany to Germany: SGN with 8 days is the average, variance is 39
This is correct. Variance is the story.
Yeah, the lane data is more useful than single reports.
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
- 1DHL was 18 days door-to-door but shipping. EMS took 22 days but cheaper and…6 comments in this branch · started by u/mod_cold_room
- 2Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell…4 comments in this branch · started by u/not_my_main_nm