tried appetite for 22 weeks. here is what happened.
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: gastric emptying matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 21 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 25 people measuring…
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
receptor distribution matters, GLP-1 is not everywhere
do not extrapolate rodent data to human dosing without saying so
do not extrapolate rodent data to human dosing without saying so
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 42 weeks to accept.
central appetite signalling is real but people overweight it
receptor distribution matters, GLP-1 is not everywhere
do not extrapolate rodent data to human dosing without saying so
Mechanistically the bit that matters is pharmacology. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
gastric emptying is real and explains most early fatigue
glucagon-receptor contribution is receptor for dual and triple agonism
cite the paper: journal, year, first author, links optional