23 months in and jurisdiction is still the thing I get wrong
Confession thread, sort of.
I went from 10mg to 2.5mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 24 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway.
So now I have early fullness I did not need and a data point I cannot interpret. Two lessons in one.
Posting it in the hope that somebody at week 9 reads it before doing the same thing.
best — the order this archive was captured in
import countries have different thresholds
the 22mg import allowance is New Zealand-specific
the Denmark import rules are specific to Denmark
The the food-noise thing was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
Yeah, Australia rules are not global.
Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 97.4. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Yeah, Australia rules are not global.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 82 weeks to accept.
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
Stalled for 8 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 73.
seizure letters: redact everything identifying
seizure letters: redact everything identifying
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Do you have an import allowance in your jurisdiction?
always state your country, advice from another jurisdiction can harm you
seizure and reship are different outcomes
seizure and reship are different outcomes
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
- 1import countries have different thresholds9 comments in this branch · started by u/teodor_lokken
- 2Stalled for 8 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 73.5 comments in this branch · started by u/erez_yilmaz