u/border_paperwork
Research-use documentation is not a magic word. Read your own jurisdiction.
member · joined 24 Feb 2025
comment on [Seizure] third one in two years. the pattern is the carrier, not the country. in c/customs · 76 points · 1 days ago
there is no safe bracket, there are only brackets that get looked at more. and nobody publishes the thresholds.
comment on [Seizure] third one in two years. the pattern is the carrier, not the country. in c/customs · 176 points · 2 days ago
The carrier pattern is real and it is not mysterious. Different carriers have different customs brokerage arrangements and different thresholds at which they refer an item rather than clear it. You are not seeing a country policy, you are seeing a broker's risk appetite.
Which is why "research-use documentation" is not a magic word. It is a document that a broker may or may not be interested in, depending on their process.
comment on [Seizure] letter arrived, no prosecution, here is exactly what it said in c/customs · 5 points · 3 days ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on [Pricing] AU pharmacy pricing, six months, three states in c/glp1aus · 6 points · 3 days ago
AU or NZ?
comment on [Question] does the glucagon arm explain the heart rate signal in c/survodutide · 7 points · 6 days ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with biopsy, not with what you concluded.
comment on [Regain] appetite came back over five weeks, here is the timeline in c/tapering · 2 points · 12 days ago
This is correct. Discontinuation data is real.
comment on [Caution] hepatic endpoints need biopsy data, not an ALT screenshot in c/survodutide · 3 points · 12 days ago
the safety profile is not just tirzepatide amplified
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Question] Poland — has anyone got a straight answer on jurisdiction in c/customs · 1 points · 24 days ago
This is correct. State your country always.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring personal import at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/customs · 46 points · 29 days ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on three years of TGA threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/glp1aus · 25 points · 1 months ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
comment on interval stretching is the most under-discussed thing in c/progresspics in c/tapering · 11 points · 1 months ago
What are you comparing it against though?
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for seizure posts in c/customs · 36 points · 1 months ago
seizure and reship are different outcomes
comment on glucagon is the most under-discussed thing in c/scamalerts in c/survodutide · 11 points · 1 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on does customs actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/customs · 28 points · 1 months ago
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
comment on [Question] Sweden — has anyone got a straight answer on interval stretching in c/tapering · -12 points · 2 months ago
the regain is treatment of chronic condition ending, not failure
comment on [Results] 87 weeks, 11kg, and interval stretching was the hard part in c/tapering · -2 points · 3 months ago
interval stretching versus dose reduction
comment on jurisdiction: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/customs · 4 points · 3 months ago
the Canada import rules are specific to Canada
comment on [Meta] the dual agonist rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/survodutide · -35 points · 3 months ago
phase 19 data is interesting, phase 38 will be different
comment on biopsy is the most under-discussed thing in c/bloodwork in c/survodutide · 231 points · 4 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on hepatic fat in c/survodutide · 1 points · 4 months ago
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.