unpopular opinion: chargeback is massively overrated
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 5mg, week 72, sulphur burps present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — escrow — and tracked it for 16 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
network selection matters, wrong chain is the expensive typo
Group buy used escrow. 3 people, 3 shipped without drama. Escrow is the insurance.
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
the 21% discount versus 26% network fees
Group buy used escrow. 9 people, 37 shipped without drama. Escrow is the insurance.
the 4% discount versus 40% network fees
USDC exists on 5 networks, vendor credits are network-specific
I am going to push back on this slightly.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
Crossposting this to c/cagrilintide because the people who need it are not reading this community.
network selection matters, wrong chain is the expensive typo
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
memo/tag requirements differ by network
escrow for group buys is standard, use it
Stablecoin or other?
Yeah, the network selection matters most.
Stablecoin or other?
the 20% discount versus 19% network fees
- 1the 21% discount versus 26% network fees6 comments in this branch · started by u/escrow_evangelist
- 2Stablecoin or other?5 comments in this branch · started by u/lane_watcher