GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] SSA survo — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 96.2% — 26 comments in the full submission. View in context.
737
c/compounding·submitted 2 years ago by u/chidi_demir

[Lab] SSA survo — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 96.2%

Explainerbranch of 6 comments

Been lurking in c/trialwatch for about 10 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 46, 0.5mg, and compounding is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 11 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle. What I actually want to…

Read the full submission and all 26 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 2 years ago
u/kavya_kravchenko73 points·2 years ago

Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.

replysharereportpermalink
u/controversial_only59 points·2 years ago·edited

state board rules differ, say which state

replysharereportpermalink
u/fatima_kowalski0 points·2 years ago

Yeah, 503A and 503B are different regulatory animals.

replysharereportpermalink
u/anya_antonsen1 point·2 years ago·edited

the 503A/503B distinction is load-bearing, do not blur it

replysharereportpermalink
u/hugo_bergstrom1 point·2 years ago

API transparency is the question that separates good compounders from sketchy ones

replysharereportpermalink
u/ferran_mensah20 points·2 years ago

no pharmacy referral codes, naming is fine, recruiting is not

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/compounding

Compounded GLP-1s as a supply route: the 503A/503B distinction, the shortage-list mechanics that made compounding legal and then didn't, state board rules, telehealth prescriber models, and what a compounding pharmacy will and will not tell you about its API source.

53kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/compounding
c/compounding rules
  1. Regulatory claims need a citation to the actual rule, notice or docket.
  2. No pharmacy referral codes. Naming a pharmacy is fine; recruiting for it is not.
  3. API source questions are on-topic and pharmacies dodging them is newsworthy.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/formulary_fighteru/usp_appendixu/quiet_moderatoru/prior_auth_pain
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →