GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] can we stop arguing about compounding until somebody posts a number — 24 comments in the full submission. View in context.
465
c/compounding·submitted 1 year ago by u/priya_palacios

[Discussion] can we stop arguing about compounding until somebody posts a number

Discussionbranch of 5 comments

Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking telehealth against eGFR for 19 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here. Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one…

Read the full submission and all 24 comments →

This branch

5 comments, started 1 year ago
u/mikkel_correia7 points·1 year ago

Mechanistically the bit that matters is telehealth. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.

replysharereportpermalink
u/naomi_erdogan2 points·1 year ago

Asked 19 compounders about API source. One told me, one dodged, one said they cannot say. The answer is the signal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/priya_palaciosOP1 point·1 year ago

Asked 24 compounders about API source. One told me, one dodged, one said they cannot say. The answer is the signal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_stanescu1 point·1 year ago

telehealth costs state board plus compounding markup, total varies

replysharereportpermalink
u/ahmed_fonseca1 point·1 year ago

telehealth costs state board plus compounding markup, total varies

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 80 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/compounding

Compounded GLP-1s as a supply route: the 503A/503B distinction, the shortage-list mechanics that made compounding legal and then didn't, state board rules, telehealth prescriber models, and what a compounding pharmacy will and will not tell you about its API source.

53kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/compounding rules
  1. Regulatory claims need a citation to the actual rule, notice or docket.
  2. No pharmacy referral codes. Naming a pharmacy is fine; recruiting for it is not.
  3. API source questions are on-topic and pharmacies dodging them is newsworthy.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.