GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Question] does anyone get a COA from their compounding pharmacy — 22 comments in the full submission. View in context.
487
c/compounding·submitted 15 days ago by u/swirl_dont_shake

[Question] does anyone get a COA from their compounding pharmacy

Questionbranch of 8 comments

Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud. The advice on telehealth in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with…

Read the full submission and all 22 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 15 days ago
u/quiet_moderatormod8 points·15 days ago

Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.

replysharereportpermalink
u/swirl_dont_shakeOPreconstitution6 points·14 days ago

The 503A pharmacy I used lost their shortage list eligibility. Same day, compounding became illegal. Rules are real.

replysharereportpermalink
u/swirl_dont_shakereconstitution5 points·14 days ago

the shortage list is temporary, it ends and compounding becomes illegal again

replysharereportpermalink
u/ahmed_okafor4 points·14 days ago

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
u/step_count_stan3 points·14 days ago

Small correction: the trial was 12 weeks, not 38. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_stanescu-5 points·14 days ago

state board rules differ, say which state

replysharereportpermalink
u/chidi_demir1 point·14 days ago

the Poland situation is different from the US, different regulations

replysharereportpermalink
u/naomi_erdogan3 points·15 days ago

Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 11 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/compounding

Compounded GLP-1s as a supply route: the 503A/503B distinction, the shortage-list mechanics that made compounding legal and then didn't, state board rules, telehealth prescriber models, and what a compounding pharmacy will and will not tell you about its API source.

53kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/compounding
c/compounding rules
  1. Regulatory claims need a citation to the actual rule, notice or docket.
  2. No pharmacy referral codes. Naming a pharmacy is fine; recruiting for it is not.
  3. API source questions are on-topic and pharmacies dodging them is newsworthy.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/formulary_fighteru/usp_appendixu/quiet_moderatoru/prior_auth_pain
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →