[Results] 92 weeks, 15kg, and cold chain was the hard part
I have had 16 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.
Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 32 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.
The independent number came back 98.4% against a claimed 98.0%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.
Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Strongly agree. Peak temperature is not the whole story.
Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 99.0. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
excursion claims need a logger trace or a photo at unboxing, not "it felt warm"
gel packs last 13 hours, after that you are relying on the box itself
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with cold chain, not with what you concluded.
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
excursion claims need a logger trace or a photo at unboxing, not "it felt warm"
Mechanistically the bit that matters is cold chain. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
Peak temperature and how long at that temperature?