[Meta] the excursion rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining
Right, the stability question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 20 data points over 26 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 4, not week 53. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
Yeah, data logger is the only acceptable proof.
Denmark to Denmark takes 7 days on average, variance is 30 days
This is correct. Dry powder is way more robust than liquid.
Peak temperature and how long at that temperature?
lane reports need origin, destination, carrier, and actual transit days
a warm courier van is a bigger problem for a mixed vial than for dry powder
The gel pack lasted 19 hours in a courier van, then liquid. Powder itself fine, the cold chain mostly died in transit.
France to France takes 9 days on average, variance is 17 days
time-at-temperature integral is the dose, not just peak temperature
The gel pack lasted 20 hours in a courier van, then liquid. Powder itself fine, the cold chain mostly died in transit.
- 1Denmark to Denmark takes 7 days on average, variance is 30 days9 comments in this branch · started by u/ewan_tulloch