tried lyophilised for 3 weeks. here is what happened.
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.
I have been tracking data logger against eGFR for 3 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.
Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.
tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
[deleted]
a warm courier van is a bigger problem for a mixed vial than for dry powder
a warm courier van is a bigger problem for a mixed vial than for dry powder
Adding to this: lyophilised is doing more work than the comment implies.
Logger trace from my shipment: 15 hours at 11°C. Powder tested 99.1% against 93.7% claim. Tolerates more than the box implies.
France to France takes 17 days on average, variance is 19 days
excursion claims need a logger trace or a photo at unboxing, not "it felt warm"
time-at-temperature integral is the dose, not just peak temperature
Strongly agree. Peak temperature is not the whole story.
This is correct. Dry powder is way more robust than liquid.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
excursion claims need a logger trace or a photo at unboxing, not "it felt warm"
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
- 1Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.10 comments in this branch · started by u/mod_cold_room