[Meta] proposal — a flair for certificate of analysis posts
I have had 10 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe. Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 32 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February. The independent number came back 99.0% against a claimed…
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
the related substances line is where the story is
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
post the whole document, not the headline number
Are you looking at area% or net peptide content? Different numbers.
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
Water content on the document? That affects your concentration math.
Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.
Tested the GLB raw material and a reseller vial side-by-side. Same purity claim, different impurity profiles. Handling matters.