the COA thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down
water content. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/sideeffects is downstream of it. Titration speed, early fullness, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort water content out first, and almost nobody does. I say this having got it wrong for 14…
purity and net content are two different numbers, same vial
the related substances line is where the story is
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
the related substances line is where the story is
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.