[Vendor] WXT vs JEEP on the same compound, same month — both cleared 97.0%
The claim in the title is exactly the claim I am making: WXT vs JEEP on the same compound, same month — both cleared 97.0%. Nothing implied beyond it. Pulling the figures out of the title: 97.0%. All of it is written down as it happened rather than reconstructed. Sent one vial to Medutest and Janoshik. 99.6% and a…
Careful — "the metadata looks odd" is a reason to ask a question, not a conclusion. Re-issues are ordinary.
axis labels included, always
Asked QSC for the batch-specific certificate and had the full document — batch, date, method line naming the column — inside six hours. That is now my baseline for everybody.
Water content 3.8%, acetate 6.2%, purity 99%, net peptide about 90% of label weight. All four numbers honest, and I had to read it twice.
Are the related substances itemised or is it a single total?
redact your own name, never the batch details
redact your own name, never the batch details
mikkel_correia has the distinction right — one is a fraction of the detector signal, the other is a fraction of the mass.
Correction: that is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning, and the document says so if you read the row label.
I would not read a rounded figure as evasive. Plenty of documents round to one decimal as house style.