[Vendor] GL Biochem vs GGPeps on the same compound, same month — both cleared 97.5%
Result first, context after: GL Biochem vs GGPeps on the same compound, same month — both cleared 97.5% . Everything below is how it was ordered, stored and sent. Numbers, in the order they matter: 97.5%. Net peptide content is the fraction of the powder that is actually peptide once counterion, water and residual…
Area percent or net peptide content? They answer different questions.
Area percent or net peptide content?
Adding the bit that always gets missed: the lot on the vial has to match the lot on the page, or none of this applies to your material.
Yes — and the reason to ask for the whole page is that the interesting parts are the ones people crop out to fit a screenshot.
Yes — and the reason to ask for the whole page is that the interesting parts are the ones people crop out to fit a screenshot.
Agreed, and the practical version is: ask for the itemised table. If it exists, you get it.
[removed by moderator]
a certificate with no method line is decorative
Same view. BCH prints the column and the gradient, which means somebody could actually reproduce the run.
Pushing back a little: a missing field is usually presentation, not concealment. Ask for the full document before drawing conclusions.
Does the lot on the vial match the lot on the page?